<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shawn Baden &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawnbaden.com/tag/iphone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawnbaden.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 03:01:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Rumors Continue: iTV (Apple TV) Coming</title>
		<link>http://shawnbaden.com/2010/08/12/rumors-continue-itv-apple-tv-coming</link>
		<comments>http://shawnbaden.com/2010/08/12/rumors-continue-itv-apple-tv-coming#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shawnbaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnbaden.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of year again. We&#8217;re getting close to the annual iPod updates and with that there continue to be rumors flying about an Apple TV update. Let&#8217;s review the relatively old rumors: The price point will be $99. It will run iOS. It will have the A4 CPU. It will have limited local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that time of year again.  We&#8217;re getting close to the annual iPod updates and with that there continue to be rumors flying about an Apple TV update.  Let&#8217;s review the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/the-next-apple-tv-revealed-cloud-storage-and-iphone-os-on-tap/">relatively old rumors</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>The price point will be $99.</li>
<li>It will run iOS.</li>
<li>It will have the A4 CPU.</li>
<li>It will have limited local storage (16GB) and offer streaming via iTunes.</li>
</ul>
<p>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/upcoming-apple-tv-loses-1080p-playback-gains-apps/">latest round of rumors</a> peg the video at 720P instead of 1080P or 1080i.  Not surprising honestly.  That a _LOT_ less data to push.</p>
<p>Also, the name will be changed to <b>iTV</b>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already been thinking since last summer it is a no brainer to move the <del>Apple TV</del> iTV to iOS.  As a set-top device it is made for it.  I wouldn&#8217;t even have to be that &#8220;good&#8221; out of the gate to get massive adoption.  Same App Store model but throw on Netflix and Hulu and some games and you&#8217;re done.  Apple would sell a truckload.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll throw in my own prediction for what we might see from Apple if they do launch the iTV:</p>
<p>In addition to the $99 option with a simple remote, I expect to see a $299 option with an iPod touch.  That&#8217;s basically no saving over buying an iPod touch separately but I bet it would still sell like hotcakes.  Think about it: iTV running iOS with App Store support and an iPod touch thrown in for just $299?  Sounds like a bargain to me.  I think Apple would see sales split about 50/50 between the $99 and $299 price point.  The other beautiful little bit of the $299 package is <u>Apple would insert not just 1 but 2 iOS devices into a household with each sale</u>.  Wrap your head around that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shawnbaden.com/2010/08/12/rumors-continue-itv-apple-tv-coming/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glass is Glass: Just How Durable Can the iPhone 4 Be?</title>
		<link>http://shawnbaden.com/2010/06/23/glass-is-glass-just-how-durable-can-iphone-4-be</link>
		<comments>http://shawnbaden.com/2010/06/23/glass-is-glass-just-how-durable-can-iphone-4-be#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shawnbaden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnbaden.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In general, glass is less durable than plastic, except with regards to scratching. This is due to the fact glass is harder and more brittle than plastic. Without getting into the details and minutiae (i.e. I know there have been cracks in the plastic of previous iPhones), I just want to point out one thing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, glass is less durable than plastic, except with regards to scratching.  This is due to the fact glass is harder and more brittle than plastic.  Without getting into the details and minutiae (i.e. I know there have been cracks in the plastic of previous iPhones), I just want to point out one thing.</p>
<p><b>With the introduction of the iPhone 4, Apple is for the first time offering their own form of iPhone protection.<b>  They call it the <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC597ZM/A"> Bumper</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shawnbaden.com/2010/06/23/glass-is-glass-just-how-durable-can-iphone-4-be/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

